6 Comments

Examining Book of Mormon Witnesses

This post is a continuation from the previous post where Richard Bushman discussed skeptical theories on the composition of the Book of Mormon.  Now John Dehlin (JD) turns to ask about the reliability of the Book of Mormon witnesses.  The audio can be found on Part 4 of the Bushman interview at Mormon Stories.

JD, “Let’s now turn to the Three and Eight witnesses.  I am going to try and instead of digging into the history like I was doing too much in the beginning previously, I’m just going to try and get to the heart of the issue.  Basically, if you listen to Grant Palmer, or if you listen to others who have written about the witnesses in a disparaging way, the picture that they paint is that the Whitmers weren’t necessarily the brightest of people, even Martin Harris weren’t necessarily the brightest of people, they followed people before Joseph Smith, they followed people after Joseph Smith, they testified to the truthfulness of the Book of Mormons and the plates and the angel or whatever, but at the same time they left the Church, and they testified to Strang or to others and to other books and to other visions or to other angels.  So on the one hand we feel like, and in your book, I was really touched by how you described how Joseph felt when he came back from the Three Witness experience.  Why don’t you just recount that really quick, because that was really moving?” Continue Reading »

12 Comments

Skeptical Theories on Composition of the Book of Mormon

Continuing with Richard Bushman’s interview at Mormon Stories, in Part 4 John Dehlin (JD) asks Richard Bushman about various skeptical theories on how the Book of Mormon was composed, and Bushman addresses them.  What do you think of Bushman’s answers?

JD, “There are theories that go around that Joseph Smith was the author of the Book of Mormon or that he collaborated with others to produce the book.  You talk about in your book Rough Stone Rolling.  But just to recap, you know the typical Grant Palmer or even Fawn Brodie type of argument is that you know at least I think that Grant Palmer would say that 20% of the Book of Mormon is word for word from the King James Bible and that even we know what version of the King James Bible Joseph Smith had and that some of the errors that were in that edition of the King James Bible actually made it into the Book of Mormon, so it’s clear that to some extent he was taking from an existing Bible and putting those words in the Book of Mormon for a good chunk of it. Continue Reading »

6 Comments

Better Depictions of the Translation Process of the Book of Mormon

I’ve finally finished the transcription of Part 3 of the Mormon Stories interview between John Dehlin and Richard Bushman (There’s a part 4 and part 5 still to go!)  In this discussion, John Dehlin questions Richard Bushman about whether the translation story should be depicted differently, and Bushman agrees that traditional paintings and tellings of the story should be changed to better reflect what happened.  Bushman also discusses that traditional views of magic shouldn’t be denigrated.  This transcript follows my previous post where Bushman discusses the translation process in great detail.

JD, “You know most people would be just stunned to know that there’s no real evidence that the plates were used materially in the translation, and that the Urim and Thummim, meaning the crystals in the breastplate weren’t used either.  That’s real different from the accounts that we kind of grow up with primary and Sunday School and Seminary.”

Bushman, “Yeah.  Well that’s the account that’s in the historical records though, so we just have to live with it.”

JD, “So we have to live with it.  You know this really does bring up the question—oh two questions.  One is, isn’t it completely dishonest or disingenuous to ever use the word ‘translator’ or ‘translation’?  Aren’t those just the wrong words first of all, and then I’ll ask you the second question later, so let’s start there.  Why do we even call it a translation?” Continue Reading »

6 Comments

The Religious Test and Cleanflix

I thought I would take a quick break from the Bushman interview for this little post.   I attended the Ogden Film Festival last week (officially known as the Foursite Film Festival) and saw 2 films: The Religious Test and Cleanflix: the Documentary.  I thought I would give my impressions.

Continue Reading »

9 Comments

Emma, Martin Harris, and the Translation Process

Once again, I’ve continued Part 3 of the Mormon Stories interview between John Dehlin and Richard Bushman.  They discuss the actual translation process, as well as Martin Harris and Emma Smith’s role in translating the Book of Mormon.  There are some interesting dynamics as Bushman discusses Joseph’s strained relationship with Emma’s parents due to Joseph and Emma’s hurried elopement.  This transcript follows the previous discussion of Moroni’s visit.

JD, “And that’s when he and Emma—he and Emma had eloped and moved to New York, and it was while they were in New York that he got the plates.  Is that right, or had they gone back…”

Bushman interrupts, “Right.”

JD, “to Pennsylvania—they had not yet gone back to Pennsylvania to live with Emma’s parents again?”

Bushman, “Right.”

JD, “So he gets the plates, and how long does he have the plates in New York before they go to Pennsylvania?” Continue Reading »

7 Comments

Moroni's Visit

In Part 3 of the Mormon Stories interview, John Dehlin gets more details from Richard Bushman about the Angel Moroni’s visit and the environment of Joseph’s Smith’s day between about 1823-1827.  This part of the interview continues after Part 2 of the interview.  John is a bit ambitious in this, and doesn’t cover the Kinderhook plates in this part of the interview, and very little of the Book of Abraham.  But I want to keep the serialized part of the transcript going.

JD, “Doctor Richard Bushman, thank you for coming on Mormon Stories again!”

Bushman, “Ok, it’s a pleasure.”

JD, “I guess this episode I’m hoping that we can cover maybe two main topics.  The first is Joseph Smith as translator, which would cover the Book of Mormon, maybe the Book of Abraham, and a bit about the Kinderhook plates, and then a second section just about the Three and the Eight Witnesses, so that’s kind of the overview. Let’s start talking about the Book of Mormon.   When did Joseph Smith first learn that he was going to be helping out with the Book of Mormon?” Continue Reading »

2 Comments

Treasure Digging in the 1800s

One of the problems that some people might have with Joseph Smith is that Joseph was involved in treasure digging and using seer stones.  Richard Bushman and John Dehlin discuss these issues in Part 2 of John’s interview with Richard Bushman.  This transcript continues immediately after their discussion of the Multiple First Vision accounts.

JD, “Ok.  So now let’s turn to one of the hottest topics today at least on the internet with regarding Mormonism, and that is treasure digging and folk magic.  If we can begin, let me just start, and that’s that you grow up in the Church thinking that Joseph Smith was this all-American boy, that yes he talks about some mistakes that he made, but just like when President Hinckley stands up today and sort of does some self-deprecating humor, you really dismiss it as saying no this guy is about as close to Jesus as anyone we’ll ever meet, is close to perfection.  That’s how Joseph Smith was, he was that way as a boy, he was that way as a man so we dismiss the mistakes that he clearly admits when he writes his own history, but then to extend that, we are taught that Ouija boards are bad and evil, that even face cards are bad. So we have this real disposition against anything that might be considered dark or black, etc.  And then on top of that, you may grow up hearing a little bit about seer stones, but you don’t hear a lot about it.  You’re certainly never taught, here’s what they meant by seer stones. Continue Reading »

10 Comments

Multiple First Vision Accounts

One topic I have not discussed in my 4 years of blogging is discrepancies in the First Vision accounts.  Basically, there are 4 accounts of the First Vision.  The account in the Pearl of Great Price is the last account, and comes from 1838.  John Dehlin and Richard Bushman discuss these variations in Part 2 of John’s 4 1/2 hour interview with Richard Bushman.  I have been publishing the transcripts of the interview serially as I complete the transcripts.  This transcript continues immediately after Bushman’s discussion of “the facts” of history.

JD, “Hmmm, well that’s very helpful.  Thank you for providing for that sort of overview of that animal we call history.  Let’s jump into the first issue, and that’s the First Vision, and I’ll set you up so you can hit the ball out of the park so to speak.  I didn’t learn until well after I graduated from college that there was anything other than one version of the Joseph Smith story. Continue Reading »

6 Comments

Bushman Talks About "The Facts" of History

This is a continuation from my previous post where John Dehlin interviews Richard Bushman.  While some people talk about “objective” history, Bushman states that such a notion is impossible.  I thought this was a valuable discussion, and Bushman shows that there can be a lot of interpretations of “The facts”.

JD, “Right, ok, yeah.  So with that, I take 10 or 11 issues just to tackle.  What I’m going to do is try and set up for you what the traditional perceptions are, have you validate where the facts, you know add the facts that tell the full story, or the full story that we can tell, so that we really know instead of what the stereotyped, you know white-washed view is, what the facts or the historical facts seem to demonstrate, and then we’ll have a discussion on you helping us understand how you might put these issues in historical context, how you might put them in spiritual context, and if there’s any debunking that needs to happen where there’s a typical anti-Mormon claim or position, and it’s just flat out incorrect.  Maybe you can inform us of that as well.  Is that fair?”

Bushman, “Well let me begin be talking about talking about ‘the facts.'” Continue Reading »

7 Comments

Acknowledging Tough Church History

John Dehlin of Mormon Stories interviewed Richard Bushman for 4 1/2 hours back in 2007.  I’ve posted transcripts of the first 50 minutes of this interview (Part 1) in 3 separate posts because it was so long.

  1. Growing Up as Richard Bushman
  2. How he chose to become a Historian
  3. The Church Should Stay Out of the History Business

In this portion, Dehlin introduces Part 2 and apologizes for some audio problems (which I thought were minor).  Bushman continues talking about some Joseph Smith biographies that he had discussed in the previous post, and then they discuss whether some issues that Mormons have trouble with are “legitimate”, and how Dr. Bushman has responded to these people. Continue Reading »